![]() That allows us to address further inaccuracies in your latest response, namely, our legal entitlement to file a complaint during a live case or controversy. We are not parties to these proceedings and lack standing to ask for sanctions. In relation to the two Goodwin lawyers, Tom Hefferon and Matt Sheldon, they are involved in two related federal court cases in Illinois and Georgia, as per the complaint filed by us. As it stands, we do not have an impartial panel nor quorum to decide our appeal. This judge is/was not part of our 3-panel and hence we’ve sought clarification if she is replacing Judge Pryor (A review of the record will provide you all the details). In the interim, a new judge, namely Elizabeth “Liz” Branch, has issued an order in our case which convincingly shows she is also impartial and bias. First, we are still waiting for a decision to recuse Judge Jill A. We would be unable to follow your instructions here as well. Moving onto the appeal at the Court of appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. Secondly, we no longer have standing in the lower court. Fl., Judge Kenneth Marra, has a complaint filed against him. The first issue is the lower court judge in the CFPB v Ocwen case in S.D. As you will see, our complaint(s) include not only lawyers, but several judges. In order to assist the VSB, we now attach a copy of the ‘open letter’ we sent to the Senate Committee on Friday which summarizes our current status(es).Įven if the reply was legally accurate, which we dispute, the VSB’s answer could not possibly be followed due the extreme level of premeditated collusion and corruption in the stated case(s). The letter indicates quite the opposite if you review our facts as discussed herein. Just as alarming, this response does not even attempt to address the questions by the Burkes nor provide confirmation or assurance that the VSB even looked at the Fl. We respectfully ask you cease and desist from intimidation when penning future letter(s). The condescending and insensitive tone of this letter is ominously similar to that of the now former Chief Judge for the Central District of California, as discussed in the article published in the LA Times (June 28, 2020). This was received at 3.57 pm CST today, Monday 29 th June, 2020 via email.ĭespite the author’s attempts to silence these elderly citizens of the United States, we reject this warning as intimidation. We refer to the Virginia State Bar’s (“VSB’s”) response letter. Re: Complaint about Matthew Stephen Sheldon and Thomas Michael Hefferon ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |